I prefer the customizability of Blogger to this. Plus it’s easier to read, at least for me. I need to find a better layout or site that allows better options before I make any moves.

Rebuking Obama, bitter racists from all across the great white state of Pennsylvania flooded the polls to carry Hillary to a crushing victory. Now who’s bitter?

Hillary is like some sort of evil, dark force that can’t be killed. No matter how many times she’s struck down, like the Black Knight, she just gets up again for the next round.

Of course, Obama’s supporters insist that she should drop out because she can’t win enough delegates to win the nomination. Newsflash: neither can Obama!

If Obama has it all wrapped up, why hasn’t he put Hillary away yet? She was trailing him by ten points going into the election. He outspent her 3-to-1. Instead of closing the deal, he told rural folks that they cling to God and guns because they’re bitter and they responded by clinging bitterly to Hillary. He lost it.

No matter who wins, Obama or Hillary, the election will be decided not by voters, but by party officials who will hand the nomination to their choice.

Which makes the real winner McCain.

Historians, as historians, can only account for what has already happened. The story of Iraq has not even finished being written. When they talk about the merits of the future they cease acting as historians and their opinions have no more weight than anybody else’s. It will be a long time before we will be able to look back on the Bush presidency and fully account for all it has affected.

Yale said it was a hoax. But as a university seeking to preserve its reputation they have an incentive to, shall we say, be reticent with the truth. After all, if some corporation had been caught in a scandal, would we simply take them at their word that nothing is wrong, and say “that’s that”?

The student who “artificially inseminated” (what?) herself sticks by the story. All she concedes is that there’s no way of knowing how many babies she killed, only that she impregnated herself incessantly over a nine month period and took abortive drugs at the end of each cycle. She even saved physical evidence and video taped herself.

How artistic.

A female undergraduate from Yale University has taken that mantra taken farther than ever before.

“Beginning next Tuesday, [art major Aliza] Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself ‘as often as possible’ while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.”

Notes Tom Piatak: “Although Ms. Shvarts’ view of art would have puzzled such as Michelangelo and Raphael, her thoughts are in line with those who defended taxpayer funding of such stellar examples of contemporary ‘art’ as ‘Piss Christ’ and the photographs of Robert Mapplethorpe.”

• How can Obama even think about condemning people who “get bitter,” “cling to religion,” and “antipathy for people who aren’t like them,” when all three have been on full display in the church that he’s been attending for the last 20 years?
• Isn’t it great how he tries to sell himself as the “common man” while at the same time being the most removed from everyday Americans?  His life experience is as diametrically opposed to that of ordinary people as you can get.
• The best part about Obama’s slip is that, for him, and liberals in general, he didn’t think he was saying anything particularly controversial.  Tucked away safely in San Francisco, he thought he could speak frankly.  Liberals always believe that conservatives and other “unenlightened” types are just dumb racists who suffer from Marx’s “false consciousness,” using the anesthetics of religion and culture to numb themselves to their reality.  Obama’s only mistake, from his view, was simply saying so where microphones were nearby.
• Speaking of it being a mainstream belief, liberal supporters have Obama have begun the old two-step defense that always gets trotted out whenever any liberal inadvertently tells the truth about his beliefs.  When Kerry made his “dumb people go to Iraq” comment and started that fiasco, liberals scoffed.  ”He would never say anything so heinous,” they said, “but what he said is true.”  So he never said it, but also, there was nothing wrong with what he said.  It’s just common sense; anyone who’s not a rube can see that.  And so we have the same playbook busted open for Obama.
• This is funny.
• I was watching CNN, and they were working their fingers to the bone trying to spin this as simply being about “bitterness,” and how “anybody could see” that they’re bitter.  It’s so simple!
• Hillary believes that slips like this are proof that nominating Obama is going to result in a landslide victory for McCain.  She’s on a quest to save the Democrats from themselves.  As long as they keep fighting, that’s fine.  More blood for the war machine!
• The fact that Obama even thought going to San Francisco was a good idea says something.  Not to mention that he then denounced the rest of America from it.
• This is why liberals never get anywhere on talk radio.  On talk radio, you have to say what you believe, but liberals who simply say what they believe sound fascist and condescending.  Instead of just calling people stupid and saying they’re better than them, they have to dress it up with fancy words to hide behind.